Improve the Chances Your Mediation Will Be a Success

Steven Mehta, an LA mediator, offers some good advice as to how to succeed at mediation: let the other side pick the mediator; avoid arguing about who’s right; leave the litigators at home; and deal with complex issues last.

https://www.adrtimes.com/improve-the-chances-your-mediation-will-be-a-success/

Read More
CEDR's Complete Guide To Commercial Property Mediation

It covers everything you need to know about mediating in this space, looking specifically at:

Commercial property mediators, Eve Pienaar and Stephen Barker, provide a guide to mediating in the commercial property space, looking at the mediation process, challenges and case studies, who should attend, advice on preparation and negotiation strategy, and settlement considerations.

https://cedr.foleon.com/cedr/cedrs-complete-guide-to-commercial-property-mediation/?utm_campaign=Commercial%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=221800795&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8Fz5WHSe5HY_R1dpRK0obHds6UyWkK_ZtzsnNAFQ-1-MS6oZXmfCxun2GM_LlTtgcV8H_mOSk34H3Jw-FJ5fEq_nCHPmGaZJwLojXlUJR4x4XOUJU&utm_content=221800795&utm_source=hs_email

Read More
A "sanction" can be the consequence of an unreasonable refusal to mediate in the Commercial Court

Stevens & Bolton, an independent UK law firm, write that the High Court ruled that while an unreasonable refusal to mediate can be a factor in cost awards, it does not automatically result in severe sanctions, as seen in Paul Richards v Speechly Bircham LLP. The decision highlights the court’s broad discretion in cost assessments, reinforcing that parties should engage in mediation to avoid potential financial consequences but that a refusal alone does not guarantee a punitive outcome.

https://www.stevens-bolton.com/site/insights/articles/a-sanction-can-be-the-consequence-of-an-unreasonable-refusal

Read More
Failure to Mediate: What are the Consequences?

Sheena Sood and Anna Braden of Beale & Co consider the case of Richards & Anor v Speechly Bircham Llp & Anor (Consequential Matters) [2022] EWHC 1512 (Comm) which, although it highlights the importance the Courts put on the parties engaging in mediation, suggests that a failure to engage in mediation is only one of the factors Courts look at when deciding on costs.

https://beale-law.com/article/failure-to-mediate-what-are-the-consequences/

Read More
Wright v Pitfield and Wright [2022] NZHC 385

Section 145 of the Trusts Act 2019 enables the High Court to order that a dispute (as defined) be submitted to mediation (or other ‘ADR process’), provided the terms of the trust do not indicate a contrary intention and the dispute relates to an 'internal matter' (i.e. a matter to which the parties are trustee / beneficiary, or trustee / trustee).

In Wright v Pitfield and Wright [2022] NZHC 385, Venning J decided that s 145 (b) was engaged, the Court had jurisdiction to direct the parties to mediation, and the Court should exercise its discretion to submit the dispute to mediation as, with appropriate assistance, the issues between the parties were  capable of sensible resolution, and there was no good reason not to make the order. Venning J considered S v N [2021] NZHC 2860.

Read More